Méthodologie : collecte de preuves et aide à la décision
At Papaya Privacy Co, we focus on capturing ground-truth evidence of the user experience. Our methodology distinguishes between objective technical artifacts and interpretive guidance, providing a structured foundation for expert review rather than making automated legal determinations.
1. Collecte de preuves de terrain
We employ automated real-browser instrumentation to capture observable artifacts—including UI state, network requests, and cookie operations—in a pristine, controlled environment. Our agents reproduce what a visitor would do through interactive browsing, not a static crawl. This approach ensures that findings represent reproducible, client-side behavior.
Artefacts de session reproductibles
Each test is conducted in a fresh, isolated session to ensure findings are not influenced by prior history. We utilize industry-maintained tracker intelligence to organize observed network traffic, assisting practitioners in identifying potential third-party data collection.
Comparaison avant le choix / après le choix
Each test runs in a fresh, isolated session. We capture technical state before any consent interaction, then simulate a user choice on the CMP (e.g., "Reject All"), GPC signal, or custom preference flow. After consent, the session reloads and may continue through optional post-consent journeys—visiting additional pages or running multi-step workflows. We compare observable tracking across these intervals so professionals can review whether the site's technical behavior—such as the firing of tags or setting of cookies—is consistent with the simulated consent signal and the paths a real user would take.
2. Interprétation et aide à la décision
Raw technical data requires context to be useful. Our system organizes this evidence to support, but not replace, professional judgment.
Synthèse assistée par l'IA
We utilize decision-support tools to summarize gathered artifacts in the context of relevant privacy frameworks (e.g., GDPR, CCPA/CPRA). These summaries provide non-binding interpretive notes, flagging patterns that may indicate risk or warrant closer inspection by a subject matter expert.
Rapports orientés revue
Our reporting is designed to facilitate efficient review. Rather than issuing a "pass/fail" verdict, we present observations that help privacy professionals and legal teams orient themselves quickly. All interpretations are conservative and intended to highlight areas that require expert assessment.